USPS defies court order!

Spread the love

Did the Unit­ed States Postal Ser­vice fail to meet a court order con­cern­ing bal­lots?

This is some­thing that could seri­ous­ly cre­ate a prob­lem for this elec­tion.

USPS Declines to Meet Court-Ordered Dead­line to Sweep Pro­cess­ing Cen­ters for Stray Bal­lots

Source.

The Unit­ed States Postal Ser­vice has flat out declined to meet a court-ordered 3 p.m. ET dead­line to have its inspec­tors sweep facil­i­ties and deliv­er mail-in bal­lots, set by U.S. Dis­trict Judge Emmet Sul­li­van in the Dis­trict of Colum­bia ear­li­er Tues­day. The agency dis­closed Tues­day that 300,000 bal­lots had received scans when they entered post office pro­cess­ing plants but lacked a deliv­ery scan that would show they had been deliv­ered. USPS attor­neys said, “Giv­en the time con­straints set by this Court’s order, and the fact that Postal Inspec­tors oper­ate on a nation­wide basis, Defen­dants were unable to accel­er­ate the dai­ly review process to run from 12:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. with­out sig­nif­i­cant­ly dis­rupt­ing pre exist­ing activ­i­ties on the day of the Elec­tion, some­thing which Defen­dants did not under­stand the Court to invite or require.” They said dai­ly inspec­tions were already sched­uled for 4 p.m.

Patri­cia Kel­ly Yeo

Since Oct. 29, USPS says its inspec­tion ser­vice has con­duct­ed dai­ly reviews at all 220 USPS facil­i­ties that process bal­lots. Sul­li­van had ordered bal­lot sweeps across metro areas in sev­er­al states, includ­ing expect­ed bat­tle­grounds Penn­syl­va­nia and Ari­zona, where mail-in bal­lots must be received by end of Elec­tion Day to be count­ed. After the missed dead­line, the judge told the USPS to “be pre­pared to dis­cuss the appar­ent lack of com­pli­ance with the court’s order” at a hear­ing sched­uled for noon on Wednes­day.

Here is some­thing that you will not hear about from the news media, Talk­ing Points from the media and the USPS appear to give an excuse for why the USPS has failed to do the right thing.

Giv­en the time con­straints set by this Court’s order
But is this an excuse or is it a rea­son?
Which one of you would be giv­en a pass for fail­ing to com­ply with a court order?
Any rea­son­able per­son can see that this issue here has the pos­si­bil­i­ty of pro­vid­ing an oppor­tu­ni­ty for fraud!

That is what we should be exam­in­ing here.

What this might mean for irreg­u­lar vot­ing issues in this elec­tion could be sig­nif­i­cant more so when you con­sid­er that the media “talk­ing points” about count­ing every vote appears to only apply to those places where more demo­c­rat votes are being sought!

WE have a seri­ous issue that we as a nation are fac­ing and that issue is the Truth! Where is the Truth? Why is the Media con­tin­u­ing to count votes! In past elec­tions the num­bers that we saw on elec­tion night would have been called even though the media have no author­i­ty to deter­mine the results of an elec­tion what we see here is a clear indi­ca­tion of mal­ice.

If you are at all con­cerned about the results of this elec­tion I encour­age you to pray because at this time the only thing that will make a dif­fer­ence is Prayer!

This nation needs it,
We need it!