It means noth­ing appar­ent­ly what the peo­ple say means noth­ing to those in pow­er in wash­ing­ton.

Take for exam­ple, the idea that there will now be pri­or­i­ty speed for only those large busi­ness web­sites that can afford to pay for those ser­vices.

FCC approves plan to consider paid priority on Internet

What this means is that small­er Mom and Pop web­sites will no longer be able to com­pete online.

It is a Death Pan­el for many of the small­er busi­ness loca­tions online where many US busi­ness­es are des­per­ate­ly cling­ing to a mea­ger prof­it.

The truth about what this means is devastating to the American Dream…

The truth is the inter­net may soon be filled with cor­po­rate garbage much like the TV pro­grams that no one watch­es today…

“There is one Inter­net. It must be fast, it must be robust, and it must be open,” Wheel­er said. “The prospect of a gate­keep­er choos­ing win­ners and losers on the Inter­net is unac­cept­able.”
The prospect of tele­com com­pa­nies cut­ting deals with con­tent providers has drawn fierce crit­i­cism from investors, star­tups and big Sil­i­con Val­ley firms. They say small­er com­pa­nies that can’t afford to pay for faster deliv­ery would like­ly face addi­tion­al obsta­cles against big­ger rivals. And con­sumers could see a trick­le-down effect of high­er prices as Web sites try to pass along new costs of doing busi­ness with Inter­net ser­vice providers.

The idea that the word Unac­cept­able has become a key­word or talk­ing point, is igno­rance, what this means is that over the objec­tion of Mil­lions of vot­ers this pow­er­ful gov­ern­ment lob­by is mov­ing for­ward in its plan to con­trol and allow oth­ers who have more mon­ey to con­trol how the inter­net works.

Per­haps it is time for con­tent providers, to show down access to con­tent that is now being dis­trib­uted for free.