Categories
Politics

zimmerman juror breaks rules?

You might wonder about the Juror that came out and made statements about the Zimmerman case.

On ABC yesterday there was an instance of “bobble head bias”

They had an interview with the Juror, who apparently had second thoughts about her decision.

The truth about this left leaning broadcast, was that there were several facts left out of the heavily biased presentation.

Fact number one.

If the State of Florida had not been allegedly, showboating, they would have charged the case correctly.

involuntary manslaughter.

This juror would have had no problem with that charge nor would any of the others.

So, first and foremost, the state of Florida was at fault here.

Second Fact.

The Bobble head, added to the statement made by the juror, (Stating that the juror was ashamed that she had done this) (paraphrased)

So, why the spin?

Again over and over again we have seen these suspect news companies act ignorantly about the facts of this case.

It appears that the media have an agenda to make race relations worse to the point of the destruction of lives.

Now I have to ask is this the way that advertisers on those shows want to be associated?

If you have a question about why advertisers continue to advertise on media broadcasts where the objective seems to be destructive to the human condition why not ask the advertiser?

The truth about advertisers is that they hope you do not notice that they are funding destructive and nasty biased news, (allegedly)

They are actively participating in this kind of tabloid garbage.

Categories
Politics

Is Bill Orielly a Liar?

Did Bill Orielly lie to the American People or did he just get it wrong?

If Bill did get it wrong will he admit that he made a mistake or will he just ignore it?

Were interested to learn more about the motivating “Factor” that caused him to depict a liberal point of view in presentation of data that suggested that in Australia Gun Control worked???

Categories
Politics

to debate or not to debate?

That is the question…

The media would have you believe that the most important qualification for
political office is the ability to debate on Television.

The truth is far from that and as usual the media have managed to at least
attempt to convince most of the viewing public that debating is the number
one consideration in choosing a candidate.

The fact is that debating in a hostile environment is likely not very practical at
all, in the last debate one of the candidates decided to skip the event, it did not
seem to matter at all.

What I find interesting is that when you see a debate where the moderators are
biased, and the main agenda is to craft a presentation that creates the impression
that one candidate or another has some magic favor that no one really understands.

They do polls that are subjective but are presented as if they were fact instead of
bad scientific guesses that frequently are skewed in favor of the paying party.

Ask a certain question and you will get a certain answer.

So in reality you really cannot trust a poll, because it is really just a representation
of the opinion of the prevailing party.  Yet you often see Fox news talk about how
this poll or that poll tells the story, but in reality it really only tells the story that
the person who paid to have the poll performed.

Who wants to pay for data that does not support their position and agenda right?

Well that sums it up nicely, because for the most part when you see someone
talk about what a polls says it usually means that they have a dog in the hunt.

When I see one of these bobble heads on the news quote a particular poll, the first
thing I consider is how many people were contacted, what time of day was it, where were
they living, in an area that is mostly democratic, or mostly independent, or mostly one view
or another.

The truth may be stranger than fiction…