Question, do you trust politicians or the president
to tell the truth?
In many ways, I think that we look at all of the campaign promises, we have not seen must in the way of truth from any politician over the last few years the real question is will that ever change or will the politicians and the president just keep on lying to us.
Are you sick of the lies?
When it comes to telling the truth are you tired of entertainment companies like fox news that represent themselves to be a news company but do not challenge or inspire the truth? When you consider this issue you have to ask the question, does fox news really present a fair and balanced news coverage. When you have a news company that “Claims to be fair and balanced does that not include challenging a Lie?”
When someone says that for example, that the President is a liar and a cheat, you would expect someone to stand up and say you know what that is not right and I expect you to tell the audience what evidence that you have to support what you just said on this news show…
Now that is a challenge to a lie, but for some reason Fox news does not challenge liars on its news programs,
Why is that?
Does fox news believe the lies that are told by some of the bobble heads they have on the air?
Are producers, stupid?
Are they somehow mentally challenged and so are unable to form a sentence? When I see someone tell a lie, I challenge them about it, because an unchallenged lie is just the same as agreeing with the lie, so if that is true does fox news believe that bobble heads are unable to think?
Is fox news loosing its edge?
Are they lying about how many people watch Fox news?
Bill orielly claims that his show is rated higher than any other cable news station, including CNN and others, but when you see lies, and liars that go unchallenged, then does that make fox news an active participant in the lie?
Makes you wonder what the producers at fox news are thinking? Makes you wonder about all the advertising you see, you know I am really about sick to death of all the commercials about female urinal catheters…
I mean really, are there really that many of them out there, and do they really want to see their problems paraded on Fox news, but more importantly is the fact that you have to wonder, is this the best that Fox news can do?
You watch these Ambulance chasers, and the commercials, about bad drugs, is that really the best that fox news can do?
Think about that, I think someone needs a good Firing…
The Liberally Biased media probably wants us to pick Mitt Romney as a Candidate, for one reason and one reason only, because they think that he cannot win in the General Election. The same thing goes for Barbara Bachman, what really is interesting is how the biased media seems to think that everyone in the world is so dumb that they cannot see through the reverse psychology tactics that are being used on even Fox news the supposed fair and balanced news company.
What I find particular interesting is how Brit Hume went about bashing Rick Perry, on national TV, now that was just really well allegedly stupid, because Brit Hume, was sort of on the edge but being the closet liberal that he allegedly is he showed his true colors in an interview with Bill orielly, and to Bills Credit, he called him on that deal, I wonder if Brit had that Aw, Shucks, look on his face as he bashed Rick Perry in a very unbalanced and unfair way.
So, while Mitt Romney may look Presidential, (seems like a good thing to say right) he may not be so presidential after all, and more so as the day approaches, the real deal here is who can beat the current president, if you say who has a better idea to get the American people back to work again, and who has a better plan to get business growing again and who has a better plan to manage the out of control unions, well that would be just about anyone at this point I would and I really cannot believe I am going to say this out loud, but at this point, I would vote for Rosanne Barr, for president if I thought she could do a halfway better job than what I have seen already.
When you see what appears to be a man dedicated to representing only 18 percent of the public and attempting to force everyone else into his little world where his reality is some form of a twisted and burned landscape of evil men and fools who think that they are smarter than anyone else, you have to ask, is this what they thought back in 1939?
Did they really think that what they were doing back then was the right thing to do?
The truth is that a leader must work in the best interest of the people, not a small very small percentage of the people but the 80 percent of America that is what America is, what would be interesting would be to see what might happen if the 18 percent that support this administration, Bill Clinton saw the handwriting on the wall and he made a decision and you know what with a republican congress and a democratic president, they worked together and they did the right thing for the right reasons, and it worked, why is this so hard to figure out?
Should we believe without question what the media publishes.
So what next?
As the 2012 Presidential Race starts to heat up we are seeing a lot of bias by the media…
In the media coverage last night it appeared to some at least that allegedly Chris Wallace, might have had some kind of hidden agenda in his questions, it should not be a surprise to learn that allegedly Chris Wallace likes President Obama, and perhaps allegedly even voted for him.
The real problem is that the man is an alleged coward.
Hiding behind the shield of pretending to be fair and balanced while secretly or not so secretly being engaged in the liberal agenda.
Here is a man who allegedly could not produce a viable book but instead published a cook book that was likely more popular than other publications.
This is not a problem, because as the old saying goes, if you cant stand the heat write about it instead.
The thing is that so often you see people like Chris Wallace that appear to try to “project” this fair and balanced news media spin when in their hearts, (allegedly) they are raving and ravening, wolves, seeking to devour the hearts of those that they interview in public.
The media has been screaming really over the last few days about how unfair, it all it, that the people of the United states do not want the same hope and change that the media wants, that is puzzling really because you have to wonder what is going through their minds.
The media used to be a noble profession, one of the first to begin publishing in this nation,
was a patriot and a printer by profession.
Things have changed, and over time, we now have something that is not what it once was, in fact we have what many consider to be a third party, a third wheel, that is very much in the spot light they pretend to be reporters, but they all have an agenda.
To combat this lazy reporting and illogical practices Fox news became famous for its fair and balanced news coverage, however that may not be as compelling as it once was Fox news became rich over this style of coverage however they have slowly begun to move in the wrong direction on how it covers politics, with so many liberal voices some say that was the real reason that allegedly Glenn Beck left fox news because it has hired so many liberal bobble heads that it was no longer the network of the fair and balanced.
Who knows for sure if it is true or not, but one thing is clear Fox news is no longer what it was back in 2000.
What seems to be slowly taking place is a tendency to frame the news in a certain light, which some other networks have tried to do and failed, allegedly NBC is one of those news companies that have failed to provide real and substantial coverage.
The thing is and this is important, if we cannot trust the media to cover the news, then are we not doomed to repeat our mistakes because if we no longer have a free press then what do we have?
If the press is no longer covering and uncovering the news because they are all about pushing an agenda over the facts then how can we as a people move forward?
How can we challenge our selves to produce a better way of life for our children?
The answer is we cannot, and that is sad, which is why more and more Americans and world wide millions of people are getting their news from the Internet, because you will not read a news story like this on CNN or NBC or CBS, because they do not cover the news anymore, (allegedly) you will see a twisted version of what they think the news should be again ( allegedly)
So the question remains, and this is important, when a nation has no freedom to speak and no freedom to say what should be said, then that nation is no longer free.
Fox news, Judge Jury Executioner,
Update did fox news, influence the trial by allegedly using negative descriptors and multiple "one way only" opinionated, bobble heads. What could happen if Fox news continues its allegedly slanted coverage and harm comes to Casey Anthony as a direct result of Fox news allowing its bobble heads to continue to rip on this woman even though she was not convicted by a jury of her peers.
Even the somewhat less than fair and ballanced, Bill orielly openly stated that he was angry.
What would happen if someone with an unballanced mind, were to go out and take action based on Bill orielly and his statements of how Angry he is about the verdict, is that right?
Is that how Fair and Ballanced news coverage is created these days or is that a mistake by Bill?
We want to know because if in the great mind of Bill his opinion is the only one that matters why not just incite violence?
The reason why you dont do those things is that no one can be certain of the circumstances, and that may even as horrible as it might sound that might also include casey, what happened, may have been a very terrible accident, that was not handled, correctly, we may never know, but you know what is worse, that is when the so called fair and ballanced news coverage is allegedly anything but fair and ballanced.
More fox news Bias
today there was a lot of alleged bias that was presented by several bobble heads, including Phil Keating, and others, who shot off their mouths without the benefit of the intelligence that most people should have before making broad statements, in fact fox news producers played a question and answer session, between the judge and the defendant, that is normal in all such cases, yet, fox news producers failed to make that distinction when they played that tape.
Some viewers may have been misled by such playing of video without the benefit of explanation, this is not right and is biased in fact it might even open up Fox news to lawsuits should someone choose to do so, since opinion and misrepresentation, is not the same thing.
Is fox news real news or are they fake news with producers that may allegedly be intentionally misleading consumers of news?
Looking at the production process how hard is it to present two sides, after all as they say, "there are two sides to every story"
And somewhere between the two different sides of this story is likely the truth, knowing this and knowing the human condition how can any media company not present both sides of a case.
is there really any such thing as fair and balanced, news?
This is an interesting video but does not NBC and ABC and CBS and MSNBC do they not also represent a point of view?
When you consider it that way does not every news company represented a point of view as well?
Is any news company a real news company?