Categories
Politics

Double Standards Media complicit?

History is a tool that the media may use to examine its usefulness however it appears that they are unable to do that even most basic and noble occupation.  Spin is in apparently where the media are concerned, in fact in order to be in the media these days you probably must fail a disparity test. 

You should remember back when Hurricane Katrina hit and both FEMA which was not well prepared, (as most of the time slow idle government agencies are not prepared for action) the media correctly pointed out that FEMA did not do a good job and because of it there was human suffering.

In that they did a great job, but what they did next was not only wrong but sad.

They blamed, Bush, I think it must have been something like this one night two media network executives were sitting down eating and drinking expensive drinks, (probably who know for sure) and one person turned to the other one and said I know we can blame the president, its been done before and it will play well on the networks.

So thats what they do, they blame bush for Katrina, for the failure of FEMA to act quickly enough.

So, Bam, over night Bush is the reason why, storm victims were facing terrible living situations.

Fast forward, to 2012…

Hurricane Sandy, true not as big of a storm and yes not as destructive, but a definite opportunity for the democrats to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they in fact do care for the people as they have for so many years claimed that they do.

So, has the media failed to report?

Who is at fault this time?

Do we have a media that will not report the news when the president is a democrat?

Why is that, I mean really think about this.

Why, are we being told by the media one truth when it comes to a political party and a different truth when it comes to a different political party, does that bother you?

It should.

If you are not disturbed by this fact, then you are sleeping through life and need to wake up.

 

Hurry up and wait.

That’s what first responders were left to do after being deployed by FEMA to assist in the storm-ravaged areas in the initial days after superstorm Sandy, FoxNews.com has learned. A FEMA worker who spoke to FoxNews.com described a chaotic scene at New Jersey’s Fort Dix, where emergency workers arrived as the storm bore down on the Atlantic Coast. The worker said officials at the staging area were unprepared and told the incoming responders there was nothing for them to do for nearly four days.

Read more:

 

Categories
Politics

Polls are they accurate?

Polls can you ever really be sure that they are even scientific at all?

Subjective data can never be trusted as valid?

When you think about it, what they are doing is rife for subjective analysis, it reeks in many ways of impure science that is often portrayed by the media as some kind of holy grail of political correctness when in reality it is hardly accurate at all.

We see polls here and Polls there, one poll contradicts another, and no one ever seems to cover the disparity…

We are always see these polls being presented by the media as some kind of predictive method that is so right that they have to design a mathematical plus or minus sign next to the figures they “come up with” the thing is are these “polls accurate at all”

 Are polls biased?

This morning some poll or another, was released, that showed, that a certain percent of a certain percent, of some people that might vote or might not vote in the next election, have some kind of negative view of the tea party.

How do they come up with those figures, are those methods really reliable?

Scientific analysis, or scientific sampling, is a process where you attempt to “sample” a group of Americans, (some of which might or might not be here legally) and you try to get some kind of information from them, however, where do they live and do they live in a particular area where one viewpoint might be held over another, and is that process fair?

The idea that someone who wanted to project a particular method they know would get the result they wanted, is really a little suspect. When you look at that situation it is fraught with dangers, in subjective analysis, that process is not really scientific, the numbers they come up with may be scientific, but the process and the method they use, may not be subjective at all. So when you see it on TV, and they say this is the latest poll, what are they really saying? This might be very subjective, it might even be biased, (allegedly) it might not be really even accurate at all?

Are they saying that the stature of liberty was really made by aliens from outer space? Are they saying that the Ghost busters, are going to be repairing the statue of liberty? Are they saying that in some universe that we are yet unaware of that the social ramifications of Goldilocks and the three bears is somehow a topic of interest to some strange alter ego? Sounds crazy right, like some kind of yellow journalism or some kind of strange tabloid headline. The funny thing here is that you could get some kind of poll numbers on any of those strange subjects, above, are they really important at all? Not really, simply the thing here is that polls do not really reflect the American public, because the sampling is too low and it is not widely dispersed, and it is not done in an objective manner.

Yet, you see this morning on the Today show, a tag line saying “allegedly” Tea party, the politics of Anger? This is the kind of biased journalism that many have come to expect what would those people do if somehow CNN started actually reporting the news what would happen then? Would pigs fly? Perhaps, because that may be what it takes to get some of these allegedly very biased news or entertainment companies to do the right thing and start reporting again…

Until then hope you find a better method of getting your news, or you could just get it here, you will not find any yellow journalism here….

Categories
Politics

Too little Too Late?

Will we find the courage to stand up for what is right in this nation?

Is it really too little too late, can we expect a different result this time, after three attempts have failed, can we expect a different result this time, have you watched gone with the wind and hoped that somehow it would be different this time, perhaps but you know in the back of your mind, that no, it will be the same thing in the end, the famous line will be rendered, frankly my dear, ….

Received in an email, (may not be the opinion of the owners of this website or its affiliates, admin, ect)

Dear Patriot,

I can’t believe what’s happening in this country! The news yesterday so clearly highlights the disparity between reality and the narrative that the big government propaganda machine is pushing, how can you do anything but shake your head in disbelief? On the same day that President Obama gave his ridiculous “jobs” speech, we were greeted by this headline “FBI Issues Search Warrants at California Solar Firm Touted by Obama.” The story here is that Solyndra took more than $500 million dollars from Obama to “create jobs” by making solar panels but,despite the giant fortune funneled to them from the federal government, they suddenly went completely out of business.

Despite this evidence that his big spending policies have epically failed, despite the promises that there were “shovel ready jobs” that Obama later joked about by saying, “shovel-ready was not as shovel-ready as we expected,” despite the other false promises that the first trillion they stole would upgrade our infrastructure and keep unemployment under 8%, despite the overwhelming evidence that nearly a trillion dollars worth of American treasure was completely wasted in the first stimulus, this President had the audacity to demand that Congress immediately pass another half a trillion dollars worth of stimulus.

Over and over again, Obama and his band of thieves have robbed the American people in broad daylight and this latest job proposal is just another blatant example. They don’t even have enough creativity to change their lies or their methods; it’s the same scam with the same empty promises and procedures. This proposal is SIMPLE THEFT and if we allow them to screw us again, it will signal that the ideal of America liberty has taken its last breath.

The Tea Party helped elect Republicans in 2010 in order to provide a check on Obama’s brand of tyranny, but this message from Speaker John Boehner does little to instill confidence that they got the message: “The proposals the President outlined tonight merit consideration. We hope he gives serious consideration to our ideas as well…”

This proposal does not deserve even the smallest amount of consideration. This Congress was elected in 2010 with the mandate to put a check on Obama’s tyranny and apparently they didn’t get the message. Using our petition system it will only take you a couple of moments to send a letter to your elected representatives letting them know that this proposal is nothing more than another thieving scam, and that you are paying attention. Please demand that not only do they not pass this bill, that they don’t even debate it.
JUST KILL THE BILL!

Using our state-of-the-art petition system makes it quick and easy to make your voice heard, please take a few minutes to participate. *There is no contribution required to use our system but your generous contribution does allow us to continue to offer this service to everyone free-of-charge!

Thank you,

Todd Cefaratti
Freedom Organizer

P.S. We absolutely must have sheer numbers to kill the bill! Please share this email with a friend using this link: Forward this message to a friend

Categories
Politics

Sarah Palin Emails

Does the tail wag the dog?

Where are all the liberals now?

 

Seems like all the news coverage did nothing and went no where.

When will be begin to see the liberals emails, that would produce a lot of scandals, or is that not of interest to the media?

Why should it matter about the Sarah Palin emails, and who really cares anyway?

This issue brings to light a lot of questions about the designs of a potentially biased and out of control liberal agenda that allegedly some people are very concerned with. One of the problems we face is that in many instances the media is taking only one side in the political structure of this country.

This creates a disparity and it creates a false sense of fact.

This is a problem for many reasons, the most important of which is that the media is in some cases deceiving the American public into believing a certain thing, when facts may not support that way of thinking.

It is disturbing because of the way the FTC is beginning to define commercials and what is consumed by the public, in some cases it might be viewed as a crime in the future, if an alleged biased media company publishes an opinion or if that news company engages in what could be considered deceptive speech then we might have a condition where censorship might be preferable to the obvious bias that has become a large part of what Americans have come to expect from the news.

When you consider the implications, that are present here you have to think seriously about what it means when a news organization takes an interest in only one party in this case the alleged biased media have show an interest in former Governor Sarah Palin’s emails, considering the issues of privacy attached here, when will see democrat emails being scrutinized, as seriously as Sarah Palin is now.

So, this really opens up the subject of how long it will be before all politicians are subject to having their emails read long after they are out of office and for what purpose would it be?

Why would it make a news story?

Unless there is some equal disclosure of democratic governors or other candidates that are running or might run for office, notice how there seems to be a lack of jurisdiction here.

Sarah Palin is no longer the Governor of Alaska, she is not running for any office, she is a private citizen.

So on what terms did this mass exposure of private material occur?

Could you be next, might you have at some point in your past had a private email discussion, did you have the right to expect you would have privacy?

Should we start to allow full disclosure of all public officials emails?

If not why not?

Because I am sure that the emails of democratic elected officials would be equally interesting to the media.

Should we not have access to all these emails of every elected official?

If not then why not and if why not then why Sarah Palin?

What makes her emails subject to the freedom of information act?

If Sarah Palin had no reasonable expectation of privacy then how can anyone have any expectation of privacy, should we now begin to stop using the internet, because it has been subjected to a double standard of jurisprudence prudence?

(yes, it is totally subjective and that is the object of this article)

I find it interesting here that we can disclose emails when its Sarah Palin but other public officials that perhaps are allegedly biased along with the media are not subject to those same standards.

I find it very interesting that the media thinks that so many people out there are not smart enough to figure this out, perhaps they will begin to take notice when the election of 2012 does not come out the way they think it will or more precisely the way they have hoped to influence the outcome of the election.

One thing remains clear, no one is being fooled.