You know it seems like a bad movie that somehow made it to the screen and you look at what is going on and you have to wonder, is this how all unions are? The answer is of course not, yet the media would have you believe that all unions are evil and that all unions are full of thugs that want to beat you up and ask for “protection money” in the form of a membership fee, sound like a plan? Perhaps, but the thing that seems really interesting is the conflict of interest, (allegedly) The media is allegedly perhaps engaged in a conflict of interest in covering this news story, because they are also allegedly union, so how can we expect to receive the right kind of coverage? How can we know what we see on the TV is really true at all? Consider this most large cities are Union, Most Law enforcement agencies are, what? You got it, Unions. So, how can we expect to even be safe in our own homes any longer? How can we expect to be told the truth about anything when unions control everything about how you live your life from the food you eat, to the laws that get passed, in some way allegedly they have some influence on it. In so many ways, we have to expect that at some point the news media may “wake up” Dear Patriot, The liberal political machine continues to ramp up their hateful rhetoric towards the Tea Party. This time it was union thug, Jimmy Hoffa, Jr., using exactly the kind of rhetoric that President Obama falsely lectured Tea Party activists about during his absurd calls for civility after the tragedy in Tucson. “We got to keep an eye on the battle that we face: The war on workers. And you see it everywhere, it is the Tea Party. And you know, there is only one way to beat and win that war. The one thing about working people is we like a good fight. And you know what? They’ve got a war, they got a war with us and there’s only going to be one winner. It’s going to be the workers of Michigan, and America. We’re going to win that war. President Obama, this is your army. We are ready to march… Everybody here’s got a vote…Let’s take these sons of bitches out and give America back to an America where we belong.” These vile attacks were not launched from some obscure blog buried in the depths of the internet. These attacks were launched before Obama himself took the exact same stage to address the exact same crowd. This hypocrisy is not shocking from a President whose extremely limited experience includes being a protégé of Saul Alinsky. If this is a war, then we are fighting it on at least two fronts. We are under attack by a coordinated assault from the left who is throwing everything at us to prevent our ideas from taking a permanent hold. WE ARE GEARING UP FOR A FIGHT WITH THE SUPER COMMITTEE, while at the same time defending the entire Tea Party movement from the vicious attacks by the corrupt with a national ad campaign. As we ramp up for this fight, we must stay on the offensive while protecting our reputation with the American people. This is now a two-front WAR and we need you more than ever. YOU CANNOT LET UP! As we battle for victories on specific legislation that we need you to participate, we also need you to get your friends to participate; we cannot let the advocates of big government reclaim the stage. At the same time we need you to contribute so that we can launch a PR campaign showing the American people that we can expose the lies being spread by a corrupt old media establishment. This is the greatest challenge that our political movement has faced and the Tea Party movement needs you now more than ever. Our hard work is already showing results in the halls of Congress. Hundreds of thousands are using our state-of-the-art petition system to demand a better government, and it is working! When we started pushing for the “Postal Reform Act” it was an unknown piece of legislation. After more than 125,000 letters were sent to Congress, even a Democrat Senator from Delaware had to take to the airwaves to advocate for many of the measures we have been championing. Now word comes that the Post Office is facing an imminent default, and with your help we can pass this sound piece of legislation with bi-partisan support! What scares union thugs like Hoffa is that only the reforms being offered by the Tea Party provide enough fiscal solvency so that we live up to the promises that were made to the rank-and-file union members on their pensions and retirements. This is not partisan, this is sound policy. Our system makes it quick, easy, and free to contact your member of Congress, and you can still participate in this historic victory by demanding your elected representatives support the “Postal Reform Act.” Thank you, Todd Cefaratti Freedom Organizer
This entire trial is like a three ring circus, with the media daily speculating about all the crazy things you might see in a situation like this and peopel foaming at the mouth that do not know as much as the defense in this case knows about the trial, you have to wonder about the talking heads in the media, what makes them think that they are smart enought to figure any thing out?
So has this judge allowed a proper trial or should he be investigated for alleged ethics violations?
This is getting just crazy, when you listen to the talking heads at Fox news, like Shepard Smith, you hear this guy talking trash at every turn. So, can this girl get a fair trial with a judge that allegedly is biased and should be allegedly recused from this case. unqualified to perform legal duties because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality
Should the judge be dismissed?
Should fox news talking heads be so opinionated, after all they are talking about life and death here. When you see the news coverage that is laced with biased information, you have to wonder how anyone could have a fair trial in these circumstances. When you see Fox new Headlines like,
(is the Casey Anthony Defense Falling apart?)
You have to ask how is it possible for a defendant to get a fair trial when you have the entire media against you. You see biased statement after biased statement, yet, no real evidence most of this stuff is so flimsy you could read a newspaper through it. How would you like to have to try to defend yourself under these circumstances. The truth here is that the media is biased and the judge could also be biased.
Can Casee get a fair trial in Flordia
Is the legal System Broken?
When the people cannot prove a case should they not work for proper punishment?
Most people think that Casee Anthony is Guilty, some think that she should be beaten and put to death.
Still others suggest that she should be given mental health treatments, perhaps even going so far as to say that she should never be allowed to have a child again?
Wait, are you serious, do some people living in Florida think that this girl should be sterilized so this never happens again?
When the media portrays a situation which might have been an accident as if the girl is a monster, to get advertisers for their new stations, is that not a conflict of interest in news reporting?
What is the real issue here, a small beautiful child lost her life, due to her mothers alleged stupidity and or willful neglect, is that actual or is that just the state of Florida, doing every thing they can to make sure that someone “anyone” is held responsible, that someone pays, and is held to an impossible standard, you have to wonder, because you look at a forensic, scientist, (if you can really call them that at all) and if all they have is one or two hairs, that may have come from the child, but they may or may not have been alive, or dead, wait, are you confused yet?
You should be because what we are seeing here is a media circus, and perhaps we are seeing a miscarriage of justice, what if, for a moment, what if, the media were not involved in this case at all.
What if there were no TV cameras, allowed…
Stupid is as stupid does…
What if, the state of Florida had to actually prove its allegations, beyond a reasonable doubt…
Think about that for a moment, how often do we allow what should have been private conversations between parent and child to be broadcast on the evening news…
Makes you wonder about the state of the justice system in the Great state of Florida.
I can tell you one thing, this case was badly handled, (allegedly) from the start.
There continue to be an absence of relevant information presented at this trial, or so it would seem, because all we are seeing of it is this admittedly very thin evidence, (if you can even call it that) there is very little evidence tying this girl to a dead body having been in the truck of back of a vehicle.
One thing that I find incredible here is that we have a girl that is obviously not the brightest tool in the shed, here and the best that the State of Florida can present to attempt and tie this girl to the death of this child is very (allegedly) weak testimony from some science geek that cannot really as a matter of fact produce one piece of evidence that 100 percent ties this girl to a crime.
Is she stupid, you bet, not doubt about it…
Does she need mental help, again you bet, your beef cakes.
Was she smart enough to hide all the evidence so that it was never discovered, until all the evidence was gone, this I believe is an easy No, this girl was not that smart.
It would seem that if this girl was half as smart as the State of Florida would have you think that she is, we would not be listening to some geek sitting in a chair with very little “real” evidence that any crime was committed at all.
In a statement given allegedly by a third party, the use of the word advised, is used on several occasions, this apparently and allegedly was in some reports from the orange county sheriff, but do real people talk like that at all?
Or do LAW ENFORCEMENT, individuals talk like this?
Do Law Enforcement officers, make statements, like subject advised me that, or this person advised me of this fact, this is just not accurate, real people in real life do not talk like this at all.
If the Supreme court rules that this can be done, then all hope for America will end.
Because, eventually they will decide that certain Americans with certain illnesses, need to be put to death, it is for the best, and it would be for the best for the health care system.
The shocking idea of that eventuality is that if a few people in Washington can decide that you have to do what they say and that you have no right to make up your own mind, well then you know eventually they will decide to do something insane and crazy.
But there will be no one to stop them, because if the people are not in charge but 9 people in a court, then we are doomed to destruction, because you cannot regulate life.
You cannot decide that a person has no choice, the only person that can decide that is God and he has given this as a gift to all mankind, you cannot take away what God has given as a gift, if you attempt it you will destroy the very thing you hope to save.
Think of it this way, the butterfly is beautiful and it is amazing to watch but if you attempt to grasp its wings they will crumble in your hands and the beautiful butterfly will die because it can no longer fly and it can no longer, feed because of the loss of its freedom to fly it dies.
It is this freedom to fly and the will to say yes or no that is our right as a human being, if you try to regulate the very air that people breath you will fail because it is not your decision to make.
In many ways, you have issues here that are serious, when an administration, files a lawsuit that is in direct conflict with not only the constitution but also the people of these United States.
Do we not have the right to Equality?
You cannot force anyone to do something that is against their will that goes against not only our laws but the law of morality, the laws of the universe, yet, we have people in Washington that would prefer to force you to do what they want you to do.
They want to force you to act how they want you to act.
So why do they try to force their will which is allegedly evil and goes against the constitution.
Why do that, when it will be defeated, when it will be put down.
Simply because you cannot prevail against the will of the people, it has been tried, but it has never been successful and it never will be successful ever.
You cannot prevail against the will of the people.
Section 9 – Limits on Congress
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
(No capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.) (Section in parentheses clarified by the 16th Amendment.)
No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.
No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.
No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State.
Section 10 – Powers prohibited of States
No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.
No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
If they really cared anything about America they would drop the appeal, but I say that I hope they do not drop the appeal I hope that they appeal it then it will mean that they will loose the 2012 election because this action is an indication of what they are and they are not for America they are allegedly against it.
Wrong, that is what this is, it is a decision based on political fodder this guy needs to step down because he has a dog in this fight.
There is a report that allegedly the judge that did this was allegedly Gay, now if this is true then that judge needs to be disbarred, he has acted improperly.
This is wrong, in the same way that it would not be right if a judge decided a custody hearing in favor of the same sex.
Because he had an improper interest in this case this if true, is the worst case of malfeasance I have ever heard about in regard to jurisprudence.
Here is the thing more than 7 million people voted for this and it was not only the will of the American people but it is the law.
This is wrong, this judge, had an alleged conflict of interest and this should not have taken place.