MailChimp conflict of interest?

Spread the love

Mail Chimp for those that might not know who or what this small com­pa­ny actu­al­ly is all about is a com­pa­ny sort of like con­stant con­tact only a lot small­er with less con­sumer func­tion­al fea­tures. Basi­cal­ly they are an email com­mu­ni­ca­tion and or mar­ket­ing com­pa­ny that sells access to dif­fi­cult to use soft­ware access to end users who want to mar­ket emails to con­sumers.

So, that is like­ly why you may nev­er have heard of this com­pa­ny before for those that do know what mailchimp is and what they are all about, con­grats you’re offi­cial­ly a nerd.

On to the news sto­ry appar­ent­ly there is a third par­ty con­nec­tion between the CDC and Mail Chimp the com­pa­ny and mailchimp decid­ed to ban any ref­er­ence to infor­ma­tion that per­haps the CDC did not like. Now this may not be the case but usu­al­ly where there’s smoke there is fire folks and as a caveat and or dis­claimer Bla­go plan­et does not share the opin­ions that ALL vac­ci­na­tions are harm­ful and or dan­ger­ous.

How­ev­er, it should be not­ed that in the past, vac­ci­na­tions were not giv­en out in the way that they are now with sev­er­al con­tained in one dosage. Most of the baby boomer gen­er­a­tion the vac­ci­na­tions were staged, giv­en at timed inter­vals, now they tend to put up to three at the same time or even more.

Ever feel like your being exper­i­ment­ed on?

The CDC recent­ly has giv­en many pause in the way that they have cho­sen to pro­mul­gate, data and infor­ma­tion in a way that sug­gests that per­haps this is not sci­en­tif­ic but more dog­mat­ic. For exam­ple the CDC failed to pub­lish that with Vap­ing the injuries were strict­ly relat­ed to con­t­a­m­i­nat­ed ille­gal vap­ing prod­ucts and did not pub­lish that infor­ma­tion even though they knew it. This is a clear vio­la­tion of the trust that the pub­lic sus­tains and expects from the CDC.

Addi­tion­al­ly the fake news sto­ry that there was an Opi­oid epi­dem­ic turned out to be anoth­er point of con­tention where the CDC failed to pub­lish and or ascer­tain the truth before blow­ing the whis­tle on a fake cam­paign that has cre­at­ed bil­lions of dol­lars of dam­age. The CDC includ­ed pre­scrip­tion med­ica­tions along with ille­gal drugs used by injec­tion that killed thou­sands and thou­sands of peo­ple. The CDC did not sep­a­rate out pre­scrip­tion use that was legal from that which was ille­gal. This left the impres­sion that pre­scrip­tion med­ica­tions were caus­ing “Thou­sands” to die every sec­ond, (sar­casm) the prob­lem was and still is that many in the media began to show images of pre­scrip­tion bot­tles along with the label Opi­oid cri­sis.

I think we have to ask is the CDC still trust­wor­thy?

The answer has to be NO they are no longer trust­wor­thy and the main rea­son for this is that the CDC has not and does not pub­lish infor­ma­tion about when they are and were wrong about assump­tions that they made and nev­er admit­ted to.

This is just not sci­en­tif­ic and it is dan­ger­ous to begin to pub­lish data in a polit­i­cal man­ner. Now it appears that per­haps the CDC is active­ly engaged in shut­ting down polit­i­cal views that they dis­agree with. If this is true then the CDC is becom­ing a threat to lib­er­ty and the free­dom of speech. dis­claimer, we do not agree with state­ments that all vac­cines are bad. We do believe that peo­ple have a right to free­dom of speech. Read more here.

Want to see more about the CDC and its ques­tion­able meth­ods of data assim­i­la­tion?

Good, because there is plen­ty of infor­ma­tion that calls into ques­tion the abil­i­ty of the CDC to do the right thing when it comes to assump­tions they make that turn out to be wrong and per­haps even caus­es great harm to patients.

How the CDC assumes then nev­er fix­es the prob­lem they cre­ate.

read more here.