more zimmerman strangeness with judge

This is really strange,

 Bizarre, Weird, Strange behavior by the judge…

Speculation is raging that the judge in the George Zimmerman case could have been put under pressure by the Obama administration after she staged a bizarre outburst during which she interrogated Zimmerman while repeatedly silencing his lawyers.

When you look at this you have to wonder what is going on here because this is not normal and when you have a huge issue like this you have to think about what is going on with this judge and should this judge even be in this situation.


US credit rating

If someone were intentionally trying to destroy the credit rating of the US government, then would that not be an act of treason?

Would it not be a severe issue that needed to be solved?

The US credit rating could be downgraded on Monday or later in the week amid speculation that Washington does not know what it is doing, and should that not be the case?  If anyone even a country keeps borrowing money without paying it back and then later printing money and not paying the money back, and later lowering interests and not paying the money back eventually the end result is financial ruin.

Any economist will tell you that this is the truth yet, for some unknown reason Washington does not or refuses to know this truth, and what can we expect if this is the way that they intend to do business?

The only way out of this mess, is two things.

Flat tax, ballanced budget, equals, another four years, for the democrats, if they keep on doing what they are doing now then the republicians wil win and the democrats will be run out of town on a rail.

So here is the deal, if we raise the debt limit, (print more money) then our credit rating will go down.

If we dont raise the debt limit our credit goes down.

If we lower our costs and set a flat tax our credit rating goes up.

It really is just that simple.

Most Americans understand this and most economists also understand this so why does the white house not understand this?

Received in an email, from Michele Bachmann

As the debate over the debt ceiling gains heat and President Obama stands firmly atop his bully pulpit, his stubborn insistence on drowning our nation in debt has caught the attention of the American people.

A new Gallup poll released this week shows him losing by eight points to a Republican, a larger margin than ever before.

With only one out of five supporting raising the debt ceiling, the American people know what should be common-sense to Congress and the President–when you’re in a hole, the first step to getting out is to stop digging.

To the majority of Americans that do not support it, raising the debt ceiling means much more than just continuing to dig.

It means placing trillions more in unfunded liabilities on the shoulders of future generations. It means abandoning the very principles that we in Congress were elected to represent.

In my three terms in Congress, I have never voted to raise the debt ceiling, and I will certainly not start now.

Yesterday, at a press conference, President Obama ignored these vital points, stating that we only need “minor adjustments” to fix our economy. At a time of trillion-and-a-half-dollar annual deficits and 9.2 percent unemployment, he could not be more out of touch.

Constitutional conservatives know that, in order for our nation to truly prosper, we need systemic reform–not band-aids. This reflects a core difference of philosophy that will be at the forefront of the 2012 elections.

The consistency and dedication that our movement has shown to stopping the hemmoraging of our future reflects the stakes that face our nation in 2012. The Obama machine will spend record dollars to overcome the opposition of the American people to his policies and win re-election, and we must work harder than ever to ensure that our constitutional conservative values are victorious. In this challenge, I couldn’t be more grateful that you are with me. Michele Bachmann


Bill orielly Anger?

Bill is mad allegedly and bill is angry allegedly but could it all backfire on him and his popularity now that Glenn Beck is gone?

 

Bill orielly Judge Jury and executioner?

 

Bill is Angry why is that?

Last night on national TV Bill continued his proscution, of Casey Anthony regardless that those that sat in judgement of her aquitted her of the charge of murder, which was right, there was no evidence that murder ever took place beyond a reasonable doubt.

No cause of death proven or even known.

No cloroform, found in trunk of car, (unproven electronic "sniffer" technology) does not count sorry bobble heads.

No DNA found, either in the car or at the crime scene, that matched Casey Anthony,

But was there some DNA found there, that matched no one in the Anthony Family?

This case was wrong to begin with now after weeks of trash talking bobble heads like Bill orielly cannot admit when they are wrong simple as that.

There are two things were I take issue with Bills take on this entire boon doggle, that was and may still be the Casey Anthony Trial, and that was that there was no real evidence that any crime took place, yet, everyone Assumed, that there was some horrible crime. 

They assumed that there was guilt because the media covered the case in every possible negative light.

Everything about this case screamed that some accident befell this child, not purposeful intent, but accident, terrible and horrible result yes, and punishment should be severe yes.

However, the state had no proof that this woman was involved in this crime.

Yet, Bill is angry, why is that?   Because he was convinced, that the girl was guilty of a terrible horrible crime?

Because he was so opinionated that he could not conceive that the girl might not have actually committed a murder at all?

Is that why he is so angry?

You see I have a problem with that simply because the media has a responsibility, to protect the public when they make statements like bill orielly made last night you can be sure that several mentally unstable individuals heard that and may have decided that they need to take the law into their own hands.

When you are a celebrity that is also a media figure, you have a responsibility to protect the public from speculation that may in fact be misplaced, now what would happen if later this year Casey Anthony is released then is gunned down, by some mentally ill person and the first thing that comes out of their mouths is, Bill orielly told me to do it.

Now we know that is not true that bill orielly did not say those words, but to someone that is mentally ill anything that a media figure says might be taken the wrong way, and bill is not the only one either, there were many others Martha McCallum, used words like justice, where is the justice, (allegedly) and there were other comments that could be considered to be incendiary, the fact is clear, here the state of Florida, made a mistake in this case, one that Jess Ashton allegedly is paying for with his job.

What if they passed a law where the families of those that were wrongfully accused, (charged with the wrong crime) that the state had to pay for the legal expenses of the accused, would that not change this no holds barred charging that the state of Florida seems to think is lawful?

Allegedly in the state of Florida if you J walk they charge you will wreckless driving, sound comical but in this case it was accurate, they had a slam dunk case, but they wanted what they could not prove, they wanted death, but they could not prove it, because there was no real evidence.

Perhaps so, that may be something that the legal profession should be pushing for.

The fact remains that there was no evidence that connected this girl with this crime, none at all and that in itself is troublesome, simply because in the world of forensics, it is very difficult to not leave any evidence behind, that is not a natural skill, it is a learned skill.

This girl did not plan this out, and if she was involved in this horrible thing, she had help.

That is the facts, and if the state of Florida had just charged the case with accidental manslaughter, or some other equally easy to live with charge, they could have gotten a guilty across the board, win, but they did not do that they wanted to take the life based on what?  Nothing, they had nothing at all, to tie this girl to this horrible thing.

yet, the media is intent upon seeking justice, that is wrong and must stop now.

The media needs to get over itself as judge jury and executioner because that is not the function of the media.

Bill Get over it, and think about what you are saying, because people listen to you and no matter how angry you might be, if someone comes along and takes action on your words, you are responsible for what you say.