Is Bill Orielly a Liar?

Did Bill Orielly lie to the American People or did he just get it wrong?

If Bill did get it wrong will he admit that he made a mistake or will he just ignore it?

Were interested to learn more about the motivating “Factor” that caused him to depict a liberal point of view in presentation of data that suggested that in Australia Gun Control worked???


Fox news “The Wizard of OZ”

You often see various different personalities on the news, often they are attractive blonds, or attractive guys, (depends on your point of view)

The thing is, too often it really seems to sound the same, they have these screens that prompt them to say what they are told to say by small minded, (allegedly) men who are often disdained by most people they meet, these protracted one track minded individuals often are called producers.

Its really a sad thing because even though you think that your watching personalities your really just hearing one voice.

You might be wondering just why the “bobble heads” say what they say in fact every once in a while you actually hear someone say something like well that is what the screen said to say!!!

Are you ignorant?

Are you Stupid?

While it might be easy to think of people you do not know in this way the truth is often very different.

Producers who speak behind the curtain like the fictional or in this case the not so fictional character, are much like the puppeteers, pulling the strings, spewing hate filled esoteric, ignorance at every available opportunity.

Its sick really when you stop to think about it, the truth is often something that the media has managed to obscure and hide by using smoke and mirrors and by using bobble heads to hide the true nature of what the media have become.

The media seem to have become some kind of conduit for the hate filled evil that we have come to know as the new face of journalism, it was not always this way.  In the past reporters used to actually report the news instead of repeat what the voice behind the curtain tells them to speak.

You see the danger here is that only one point of view is being broadcast, the actors may change but the voice remains the same that is a sick and perverted method of subverting the public discourse.

The only thing here to understand is that advertisers are by an large, the real violators here.

Stupid is as Stupid does…

When you purchase products that are advertised on these disgusting shows, that tell lie after lie, all the while pretending to be your best friend, you are supporting the lie, you are what you eat, what you view on TV.

Eventually the advertisers will come to understand that by associating themselves with these sub standard venues, that create ill will toward a certain class of people, that there will be a price to pay for that kind of behavior.

They think that people are too stupid to figure it all out.

They are wrong…

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Media interferrance in 2012 election?

 

 So if you believe the media Obama

has already won…

 

You Lie…

Why the Media is getting away with Treason?

Has the media gone out of its way to trouble and or interfere with the election cycle as a pundit, an opinionated slobbering malcontent that continually seeks to present one view while attempting to silence anyone that disagrees with them?

It would appear that this is what many in the past feared about the media, from brain washing to bribery its like a bad western movie where the actors all speak with bad dialog, but in this case its likely true.

When the news ceases to be the news and becomes something else that is something that you should seriously consider.

The single largest problem facing Americans is that we have a biased media that is distorting the news in favor of one point of view.

This has been tried over and over again, this were all alike thing is nonsense, we are not all alike we are all different, sure some of us like the same food, perhaps we might even like the same sports, read the same books, but never think that were alike to the point of lunacy.

What is this thing that we all see but often refuse to acknowledge?   Socialism, does not work, period, sure it might look good on paper, but every time its been tried it has failed, why is that?  The human condition, that’s it, were human, that means corruption, when corruption enters the idealistic space of socialism, that is when socialism fails.

It would be nice if everyone had a car to drive, if everyone had a drivers license, if everyone had stock to trade, if everyone had something to call their own, if only everyone were the same right?  But that is not right, there will always be those in our society that will never be able to have or own anything because they value the moment over the future.

Its just the way it is, we cannot control them or make them in to new human beings, that magically learn how to manage assets, they will trade it off for the next thing to come out, just as they did when trading glass bobbles, and worthless trinkets, men were deceived thinking that what they were receiving was of worth, later finding out they had been tricked.

You see, this always ends the same way, a group (usually a small group) of people get together and try to fix everything that’s wrong with the world, they say “Cant we all just get along” We know how that ends, it ends like it does every time, like it did in benghazi when you meet an animal on the trail in the forest, it is just you and the animal, if you show weakness, that animal will attack and you will not survive, when it comes to being a pacifist, there is no strength in showing weakness.

Vote, tomorrow, because we know what works for America and this is not it.

The truth is that it is not possible to create the perfect socialist society because it works on a lie.

The lie is that there is even one perfect human that might somehow be able to run the world, that is the most serious problem.

As well you would need thousands of other perfect human beings, to also be free from the temptation of corruption.

We all know this is just not possible if it were we would would not need the law or laws, yet we do, Vote because, when men attempt to do the impossible it always falls on the shoulders of we the people.

Vote because it is time to go with the road you know instead of a fantasy.

 

 

 

 


Racist Media? Liars in the Media

Without Advertisers the media would have no power at all…

without viewers the media would have to stand in the unemploymet line

Are we facing a media that has gone insane?

We saw with the George Zimmerman case that members of the media were guilty (allegedly) of editing the audio file of the 911 call to make it sound as if racism was a part of the call but it turned out that this was a lie…

Then later we saw where allegedly a member of the media edited video to make it appear that george zimmerman was not hurt as badly as it was at first reported, this was and is a serious problem really its bad, how would you like it if members of the media made up lies about you just to make a story sound good?

[kc_heading_pac_9_headline_sub_4 size=”50″ color=”#000000″ ]Media Liars Media fools..[/kc_heading_pac_9_headline_sub_4]

Think about this what if the media had intended to start a riot and then cover the burning homes and cars of people that were effected by the lies of the media?

Media lies the evil of ignoring the truth and how hot must hell be for those that create evil and allow others to enslave America?

When much of what you watch on TV is made up or a distortion of the truth…

We find that often situations like the recent one in Colorado can happen…

With so much sadness going on should we be looking at making an adjustment in the 24 hour format where the same news is presented for consumption over and over again could it be that we are programming people to create problems for our society?

Are we able to find our humanity?

What has happened to America is it too late to save this nation or has the media created a situation where racism is behavior that appears to be what the media allegedly would like to manipulate the public perception of crimes committed.

We can see by the George Zimmerman situation that a situation has occurred where the media were proved to have committed fraud in producing a news story that was false and which depicted lies as if it were factual.  

We now know that not only were photos doctored and audio files doctored but we saw many other issues with the way reporters used words and inflection in diction to display what was an obvious bias.

They made statements on TV which were later proved to be lies yet nothing was ever said or done publicly to protect the idea of fair and accurate reporting in the media what happened.

What can we do about an out of control media that can say or do anything and not be held accountable?

Think about this if you were to have done such a thing how long do you think it would take them to file criminal charges, think fraud, inciting riots, perhaps even federal charges would be filed, if you said something and did something like was done in this case, you would probably go to jail for up to 20 years.

Now I ask you why is the media allowed to lie, cheat, steal, commit fraud, incite riots and all manner of evil and face no recourse?

One answer to that question is that the media must be held accountable for criminal behavior they cannot be allowed to distort the truth using lies, if they will not do this on their own they must be punished.

We the people cannot allow the media to influence public thought by using altered facts and lies as well as fraud and subversion of our system of government, this behavior would not be tolerated by any one of us so we must not allow the media to get away with doing what would be a criminal matter for any one other than a person of the media which takes one particular point of view.

Is it improper it is wrong and it is not the American Way…

 

 


Bill Hemmer liberal bias?

Is Bill Hemmer a liberally biased bobble head?

Liberal Bias is it reporting or is it political nonsense.

Update, again today, on Tue the 26th allegedly Bill Hemmer, showed his true colors by not challenging an obviously flawed commentary made by an alleged spin consultant, but what is the aim of Bill Hemmer, is he really as liberal as he seems to be?  Who knows for sure, because sometimes it seems as if fox news is run by alleged idiots.

Could be, this morning on national TV, he had a man who allegedly lied, and not by just a little this man lied by a hundred yards or more, yet, Bill let it ride, he did not challenge the mans alleged lie at all?

What kind of reporting is that anyway?

Fair and Balanced?

The topic was about the Budget deal, facts were not represented, facts that should have been discussed were not, what they did discuss was based on conjecture, bias and skull skullduggery, yes, Bill did nothing there was no fair and balanced discussion on this topic at all, so the question comes up is this news?

Is this a news company or a tabloid?

Certainly you have seen and heard in the news about the most recent scandals concerning the parent company of Fox news, when you see these types of things come up you have to wonder what is going on, who is running this company?

Because in the past there was real discussion and not just one side of a poorly thought out interview.

Plainly there is a problem in Fox news and it is hoped that someone in that organization can find a method of developing the right kind of answer, simply because one side of a discussion is not news, certainly not when the company in question claims to be fair and balanced.

So what exactly was wrong with this discussion and the alleged bias presented by the “former” CBO official on Fox news?

Simple, he stated, that the plan presented by the Republicans has no real cuts, so no real savings could be obtained, however he failed to compare apples with apples, because the liberal point of view claims that they can save money through reducing fraud, a great thing my fiends for sure, but apparently only liberals can claim to be able to reduce fraud because no mention was made to this fact, that if fraud can be uncovered by democrats, then certainly it can be uncovered by Republicans, so again, fox news did it self no favor, Bill hemmer, stared at the TV camera, and made no method of argument against this flawed view point.

It is amazing that anyone would even believe this kind of trash presented on TV…

So, the prescription drug benefit, is a problem for our budget, but we have no problem with spending millions of dollars, for Art, work that is not really ART, we have no problems spending money for protecting Rats, in a Swamp, (allegedly) in Nancy Ps, district. We have no problem in Billions in government waste and fraud.

Yet, the only thing the liberals have to talk about is to try and scare seniors?

Really? 

That is your entire deal?

I was really surprised that bill hemmer made no effort to do anything to question all this questionable material, it was a surprise, because the guy looks smart enough but is he really, where did Bill hemmer come from anyway?

CNN, ops, yes, perhaps Bill is not as fair and balanced as he should be and perhaps bill hemmer should consider that the next time he allows a man to allegedly come on national TV and lie it is not a good thing…

 


fox news bias

Fox news, Judge Jury Executioner,

 

Update did fox news, influence the trial by allegedly using negative descriptors and multiple "one way only" opinionated, bobble heads.  What could happen if Fox news continues its allegedly slanted coverage and harm comes to Casey Anthony as a direct result of Fox news allowing its bobble heads to continue to rip on this woman even though she was not convicted by a jury of her peers.

Even the somewhat less than fair and ballanced, Bill orielly openly stated that he was angry.

What would happen if someone with an unballanced mind, were to go out and take action based on Bill orielly and his statements of how Angry he is about the verdict, is that right?

Is that how Fair and Ballanced news coverage is created these days or is that a mistake by Bill?

We want to know because if in the great mind of Bill his opinion is the only one that matters why not just incite violence?

The reason why you dont do those things is that no one can be certain of the circumstances, and that may even as horrible as it might sound that might also include casey, what happened, may have been a very terrible accident, that was not handled, correctly, we may never know, but you know what is worse, that is when the so called fair and ballanced news coverage is allegedly anything but fair and ballanced.

 

More fox news Bias

today there was a lot of alleged bias that was presented by several bobble heads, including Phil Keating, and others, who shot off their mouths without the benefit of the intelligence that most people should have before making broad statements, in fact fox news producers played a question and answer session, between the judge and the defendant, that is normal in all such cases, yet, fox news producers failed to make that distinction when they played that tape.

Some viewers may have been misled by such playing of video without the benefit of explanation, this is not right and is biased in fact it might even open up Fox news to lawsuits should someone choose to do so, since opinion and misrepresentation, is not the same thing.

Is fox news real news or are they fake news with producers that may allegedly be intentionally misleading consumers of news?

 

Looking at the production process how hard is it to present two sides, after all as they say, "there are two sides to every story"

And somewhere between the two different sides of this story is likely the truth, knowing this and knowing the human condition how can any media company not present both sides of a case.

 

is there really any such thing as fair and balanced, news?

This is an interesting video but does not NBC and ABC and CBS and MSNBC do they not also represent a point of view?

When you consider it that way does not every news company represented a point of view as well?

Is any news company a real news company?

 


Can Casey Anthony get a fair trial?

Guilty as charged, that is what we will see, and why is that you may ask?

Why wait, for a verdict, everyone knows that she is guilty, right?

Everyone knows it because the media has told us for days, that they "think" she is guilty.

Simple, this case was tried in the court of public opinion and it was tried in the media.

But ask your self one thing, if Casey Anthony is so stupid, and such a monster, how did she manage to leave no evidence behind?

There are a lot of implications in the idea that this trial has been for the most part played out in the media.

When you have personal opinion presented as fact, can anyone have a fair trial is this the end of the justice system as we know it. 

There are indications allegedly that the judge may not be fair minded in his approach to adjudicating, this case allegedly he has sided with the prosecuting agency in allegedly 98 percent of the objections.   Even in stupid cases, the average is 78 percent allegedly.

That is a difference of 20 percent allegedly give or take a percentage point or two, the thing that is really amazing here is that you have what appears to be bias from allegedly the judge in this case, so what is up with that, if it is true can this young lady (I know some people think that she is guilty and should be tired and executed in the press)

The thing is should a media company have only one point of view?

Can this girl get a fair trial, when the media is constantly and allegedly presenting only a biased point of view can she get a fair trial, just curious because it looks like everyone in the world is convinced, that this girl murdered her own child and there is no proof, period, nothing the prosecution has presented is real allegedly they can prove nothing about her actual connection to this tragedy, now, is this woman morally responsible for her child, (Yes certainly) and she should be punished, but without proof can we begin to start putting people to death?

Should the media only present one side of an issue, considering that this is a life and death care, should the media be allegedly biased?

That is something that is serious and it is something that people should seriously consider.


gallop poll garbage

can we trust the polls?

Are they real?

is the media making up lies to help support a candidate?

Can michele bachmann actually win or is this an attempt of the lame stream media to influence an election in an unfair way?

Is there a real basis of this poll?

When you look at statistics, what is more likely 5000 likely voters from 10 different area codes, or 1000 voters from two different area codes?

What makes more sense?

That the poll is biased or that it is just garbage and lies?

you have to wonder about this issue.

The idea that only one person can product a news story, and that only the liberal point of view is accurate, well that is just plain nonsense.

Can Michele Bachmann actually win as a candidate or is this just another attempt by the media to influence the political process?

When you carefully consider the issues that you see so often there are some that may not actually be presenting the entire story.

Would the media still support the same candidates over time and if they did would that then be fair?

The question is a good one because there are so many issues out there that effect the political process.

can we trust the media to tell us the truth or is the media to be trusted at all?


Government shut down

The Government shut down could save the tax payers, 5.6 Trillion dollars and save America, what do you think Americans want to do?

Shut it Down, when men of Good Conscience, cannot do the will of the people in hard times, they should step aside and resign, America is more than just one man it is more than just a cabinet, it is more than just politicians, it is the people, it is we the people.

The issue remains clear programs that support mice that live in swamps, spending millions of dollars when Americans are hurting.

NPR radio spends millions of dollars supporting only one point of view.

This is Wrong, it is not the American way.

$90 Billion Spent on Flawed Programs

$100 Million in Unused Flight Tickets

a 800-foot-long replica of the Great Wall of China, Cost, $700,000

The list goes on and on and on…

Medicare Buys Shoes For Amputees & Walkers For Paraplegics

$700,000 this year investigating methane gas emissions from dairy cows.

The Census Bureau blew $2.5 million on a 30-second ad that ran during the Super Bowl.

They say that they cannot find a place to cut out wasteful spending?

Is this the hope and change you voted for?


NPR scandal?

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.”

While the preceding statement would seem to leave no hope for humanity, cutting off funding for an organization that has demonstrated a clear agenda driven by only one point of view, (allegedly) would seem to be a good move, it is through these dark days that men with clear character and the back bone to stand up to those who would enslave humanity, (allegedly) must see through to the light that shines in the darkest night the light of truth.  When an organization like this one that has time after time shown that it cannot process information in a fair and balanced manner accepts public funds from the public whom are made of a diverse set of values, we cannot in good conscious allow this to continue as if it were some kind of entitlement.

It is time to pull the covers off of these monsters, (allegedly) and reveal the dark hearts of those that seek to defame and destroy.

When one side of the scales become too weighted the result is not a desirable thing, in fact the idea that one point of view or another is the only point of view is a dangerous thing, yet so often we see so many people that try to force their views on the world.

One example was Hitler, it was extreme, it was horrible, it was terrifying, yet, people allowed it to happen because they were afraid to say anything about it, when you examine the many horrible things that happened, and the very real promise that this would never be allowed to happen again, you have to come to the conclusion that when a station like NPR has only one point of view “most of the time” then that is just as wrong as they say it is for Fox news to have a balancing point of view.

This is what you get?

This is the hope and change you voted for?
This is the special interests that we would not have?

My friends this is just Amazing, when a broadcasting company receives money from the public, but they only support one side of the equation, the people of the US are diverse, there is more than one view that must be represented.

It is impossible to only represent one view point, when you take money from all Americans, you have the responsibility to present an equal view, otherwise you should not take the money.

It is Amazing, to see this kind of behavior, it has been going on for years, just like you see the unions only supporting one political party, considering the potential for corrupt behavior, you must find a way to equally represent the members of your union, yet, only one side is represented.

This cannot work, simply because even in a union there are differing and divergent points of view, again we are faced with the idea that only one point of view is ever represented, this is wrong.