What if?

What if we are all wrong?

What if every one is wrong and President Obama is right?

When you think about it, what if the White House is right and everyone else in the world is wrong?

The economy is a big thing, just imagine if the Mississippi river represented the economy of the United States, if you wanted to fundamentally change the direction and the flow of the Economy when it has run in one direction for many many years, how long would it take to see a change?

One year, Two years, Three years.

More…

The President only has four years to make a difference, but the thing here is does the Economy have that long to recover or to change in any reasonable way at all.  Allegedly about 82 percent of the voting public in the US is against the current direction of the economic issues that the US faces.

How would we know if everyone were wrong but only a few were right, looking at the figures, if one out of one million were right and the 999,000 were wrong how would you ever know it? Because we live in a democracy, at least we tell ourselves that is what we live and what we believe in, in the past it has been proven that the majority were wrong, but it is usually statistically not significant.

The world is not likely to end if millions are wrong, and the one is right.

We know by studying history that we can anticipate human behavior, even logically predict it, however over time, we know that when we see certain signs of economic growth we can anticipate prosperity in a meaningful way.

 We are three years, into this plan, and we could see some action over the next few months the thing is this is it correct?

One thing for sure, if we are indeed not going in the right direction do we have yet another, chance to get it right or is this the last chance?

 If this is our last chance to make it right, should we not be certain that we are doing the right thing for everyone not just a few.

Last night, Emotion seemed to be the main thing, Michele Bachmann talked emotionally about a subject that on the surface seemed to be of interest however, was it really that interesting, and was it accurate, considering that no one is forced to do something against their will, (opt out provisions are always provided)

Can we really rely on a woman that does not distinguish between the facts and the reality of any given situation, just for drama?

I found several things somewhat disturbing, last night, Ron Paul, seemed to be of the idea that someone should be allowed to die if they choose to have no insurance coverage, that was a real issue and it is a scary thing, more so if you happen to be the one that is in need of health coverage and you don’t have it.

I know someone right now that is sick and cannot get treatment, because she is not sick enough.

Imagine that, we have to wait until she is so sick that her life is threatened, until she might possibly die.

Then she can get some help, but if it involves cancer, and that is the likely result here, then early detection and treatment, can increase success rates, by 70 percent or more, survival rates are also much higher for early detection.

 

 

 


Time to fire some people

He is so out of touch that he insisted that America’s credit rating would not be lowered, only to see S&P do exactly that and downgrade our debt rating.

He pushed for higher taxes on the American people even though he failed to pay his own taxes! He pushed through tens of billions of dollars in backdoor bailouts to banks, and then tried to cover it up.

For these, and many other reasons, we join with Senator Jim DeMint, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, Congressman Ron Paul, Senator Jim Bunning, Congressman Connie Mack, presidential candidate Herman Cain and many others in demanding that Timothy Geithner be fired from his position as U.S. Treasury Secretary.

The United States simply cannot afford to have Timothy Geithner do any more damage to our economy and our country.


US credit rating

If someone were intentionally trying to destroy the credit rating of the US government, then would that not be an act of treason?

Would it not be a severe issue that needed to be solved?

The US credit rating could be downgraded on Monday or later in the week amid speculation that Washington does not know what it is doing, and should that not be the case?  If anyone even a country keeps borrowing money without paying it back and then later printing money and not paying the money back, and later lowering interests and not paying the money back eventually the end result is financial ruin.

Any economist will tell you that this is the truth yet, for some unknown reason Washington does not or refuses to know this truth, and what can we expect if this is the way that they intend to do business?

The only way out of this mess, is two things.

Flat tax, ballanced budget, equals, another four years, for the democrats, if they keep on doing what they are doing now then the republicians wil win and the democrats will be run out of town on a rail.

So here is the deal, if we raise the debt limit, (print more money) then our credit rating will go down.

If we dont raise the debt limit our credit goes down.

If we lower our costs and set a flat tax our credit rating goes up.

It really is just that simple.

Most Americans understand this and most economists also understand this so why does the white house not understand this?

Received in an email, from Michele Bachmann

As the debate over the debt ceiling gains heat and President Obama stands firmly atop his bully pulpit, his stubborn insistence on drowning our nation in debt has caught the attention of the American people.

A new Gallup poll released this week shows him losing by eight points to a Republican, a larger margin than ever before.

With only one out of five supporting raising the debt ceiling, the American people know what should be common-sense to Congress and the President–when you’re in a hole, the first step to getting out is to stop digging.

To the majority of Americans that do not support it, raising the debt ceiling means much more than just continuing to dig.

It means placing trillions more in unfunded liabilities on the shoulders of future generations. It means abandoning the very principles that we in Congress were elected to represent.

In my three terms in Congress, I have never voted to raise the debt ceiling, and I will certainly not start now.

Yesterday, at a press conference, President Obama ignored these vital points, stating that we only need “minor adjustments” to fix our economy. At a time of trillion-and-a-half-dollar annual deficits and 9.2 percent unemployment, he could not be more out of touch.

Constitutional conservatives know that, in order for our nation to truly prosper, we need systemic reform–not band-aids. This reflects a core difference of philosophy that will be at the forefront of the 2012 elections.

The consistency and dedication that our movement has shown to stopping the hemmoraging of our future reflects the stakes that face our nation in 2012. The Obama machine will spend record dollars to overcome the opposition of the American people to his policies and win re-election, and we must work harder than ever to ensure that our constitutional conservative values are victorious. In this challenge, I couldn’t be more grateful that you are with me. Michele Bachmann


gallop poll garbage

can we trust the polls?

Are they real?

is the media making up lies to help support a candidate?

Can michele bachmann actually win or is this an attempt of the lame stream media to influence an election in an unfair way?

Is there a real basis of this poll?

When you look at statistics, what is more likely 5000 likely voters from 10 different area codes, or 1000 voters from two different area codes?

What makes more sense?

That the poll is biased or that it is just garbage and lies?

you have to wonder about this issue.

The idea that only one person can product a news story, and that only the liberal point of view is accurate, well that is just plain nonsense.

Can Michele Bachmann actually win as a candidate or is this just another attempt by the media to influence the political process?

When you carefully consider the issues that you see so often there are some that may not actually be presenting the entire story.

Would the media still support the same candidates over time and if they did would that then be fair?

The question is a good one because there are so many issues out there that effect the political process.

can we trust the media to tell us the truth or is the media to be trusted at all?