If you have ever thought about that moment when you go from being someone that just thinks its ok for only some people to own guns to what it means to really need that second amendment then this is for you.
You see it is not just about being able to hire someone to stand guard over you and your loved ones.
Because not everyone can afford that kind of protection.
What is truly sad is all those people in congress that tend to think that you and your loved ones do not deserve to be protected.
That is what the truth is. You might go your entire life never needing the protection and the safety of owning a firearm.
IF one day though you do need that protection it is something that is definitely worth the time and investment of owning and learning how to use a weapon.
WE know that we cannot always count on law enforcement or a neighbor to be in the right place at the right time to come in and save the day or the girl for that matter.
The real truth about defending your life and your family is that the police as much as they would like to be able to come in and save you and your family are not likely to be waiting outside your home to help you when you need it.
We have some great men and woman who are in law enforcement that are willing to put their lives on the line to keep you safe but the fact remains that they cannot be everywhere all at the same time.
If someone is obviously mentally ill enough to be a risk to himself and others as well as the community then why did law enforcement respond to this alleged shooter’s address so many times and yet there was still no action taken… Continue reading…
Or is it just for the few that can afford to have armed guards follow them around everywhere they go?
Should Americans be forced to submit to subjective criteria on who is deserving of constitutional and legal protections?
Should we say that based on what we believe is a risk you will be required to turn in your guns because we have determined that you may be a risk. WE do not have to prove that you may be a risk we just have to believe it might be possible.
WE might even begin to say that you fit into a certain group or class of citizens that might one day become a risk…
Is there anything that the media will not lie to you about?
Seriously think about it.
Is there anything that these Fake Media outlets will not choose to spin into something that they think is a (Fact Checking website)
Watch as you see what Snopes.com does when confronted with the truth of the Holocaust.
Snopes basically states that the following was not related to the issue of the taking away of all guns from the peoples of these nations before millions of people were murdered. Does that sound right?
So if you were to apply the same logic that snopes applies to its so called “FACT CHECKING” then they are saying that the Holocaust is mostly false. Snopes is splitting hairs in order to present a mostly biased conclusion by making a distinction here about how the words Gun and Control are defined…
They Deny the truth about the extermination of millions of people…
That cannot be true?
No, it is not true but here is the problem with how snopes chooses to make distinctions in how it defines Gun Control.
That is the real problem here and it is something that exposes Snopes as BIASED.
They admit the Fact that guns were taken away from a peaceful population just prior to a mass murder event where hundreds of thousands of people were murdered and guess what most of them were murdered by Guns…
Snopes makes a distinction that is bias.
Here is the lie.
“Gun control” isn’t synonymous with gun confiscation; in some cases where genocides took place, the gun laws in force had existed for years, even decades; evidence does not demonstrate a causal link between gun control and mass exterminations.
So what is the problem with snopes?
They tell you that Gun Control is not the same as Gun confiscation…
Is that true?
No it is false so in this case Snopes lied to you.
Call it whatever you want to call it, Gun Confiscation, Gun Control, Gun licensing, Guns just for the elite who will later choose to murder you with those guns that were too dangerous for you to have but not for them.
So in essence here what we have is a publication that is obviously biased and they are in favor of Gun Control.
They are fine with the government taking your guns away.
They feel that the world would be so much better without guns.
The real problem here is that those same people that run snopes that own it and that support it are the same people that have hired guards with guess what “Drum Roll Please” Armed Guards or in many cases they actually own guns too.
They just do not want you to have the right to own a gun.
Typical liberal organization.
So if you want to do some fact checking do not depend on snopes or other organizations that have a bias because you will not get the truth from them.